首页> 外文OA文献 >Can malaria vector control accelerate the interruption of lymphatic filariasis transmission in Africa; capturing a window of opportunity?
【2h】

Can malaria vector control accelerate the interruption of lymphatic filariasis transmission in Africa; capturing a window of opportunity?

机译:疟疾媒介控制能否加速非洲淋巴丝虫病传播的中断;抓住机会之窗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background\ud\udThe Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) was launched in 2000, and nearly all endemic countries in the Americas, Eastern Mediterranean and Asia-Pacific regions have now initiated the WHO recommended mass drug administration (MDA) campaign to interrupt transmission of the parasite. However, nearly 50% of the LF endemic countries in Africa are yet to implement the GPELF MDA strategy, which does not include vector control. Nevertheless, the recent scale up in insecticide treated /long lasting nets (ITNs/LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) for malaria control in Africa may significantly impact LF transmission because the parasite is transmitted mainly by Anopheles mosquitoes. This study examined the magnitude, geographical extent and potential impact of vector control in the 17 African countries that are yet to or have only recently started MDA. \ud\udMethods\ud\udNational data on mosquito bed nets, ITNs/LLINs and IRS were obtained from published literature, national reports, surveys and datasets from public sources such as Demographic Health Surveys, Malaria Indicator Surveys, Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys, Malaria Report, Roll Back Malaria and President’s Malaria Initiative websites. The type, number and distribution of interventions were summarised and mapped at sub-national level. and compared with known or potential LF distributions, and those which may be co-endemic with Loa loa and MDA is contraindicated. \ud\udResults\ud\udAnalyses found that vector control activities had increased significantly since 2005, with a three-fold increase in ITN ownership and IRS coverage. However, coverage varied dramatically across the 17 countries; some regions reported >70% ITNs ownership and regular IRS activity, while others had no coverage in remote rural populations where the risk of LF was potentially high and co-endemic with high risk L.loa. \ud\udConclusions\ud\udDespite many African countries being slow to initiate MDA for LF, the continued commitment and global financial support for NTDs, and the concurrent expansion of vector control activities for malaria, is promising. It is not beyond the capacity of GPELF to reach its target of global LF elimination by 2020, but monitoring and evaluating the impact of these activities over the next decade will be critical to its success.
机译:背景\ ud \ ud全球消除淋巴丝虫病规划(GPELF)于2000年启动,美洲,东地中海和亚太地区的几乎所有流行国家现在都发起了WHO建议的大规模药物管理(MDA)运动来中断传播寄生虫。但是,非洲近50%的LF流行国家尚未实施GPELF MDA策略,该策略不包括病媒控制。但是,最近在非洲使用杀虫剂处理的/长效蚊帐(ITNs / LLINs)和用于控制疟疾的室内残留喷洒(IRS)的规模可能会显着影响LF的传播,因为该寄生虫主要通过蚊子传播。这项研究检查了17个尚未开始或刚刚启动MDA的非洲国家中病媒控制的规模,地理范围和潜在影响。蚊帐,ITN / LLIN和IRS的国家数据来自公开文献,国家报告,调查和公共数据集,例如人口健康调查,疟疾指标调查,多指标类集调查,疟疾报告,减少疟疾和总统疟疾倡议网站。总结了干预措施的类型,数量和分布,并在地方层面进行了规划。并与已知或潜在的LF分布进行比较,并禁止与Loa loa和MDA并存的那些。 \ ud \ udResults \ ud \ ud分析发现,自2005年以来,媒介控制活动显着增加,ITN所有权和IRS覆盖范围增加了三倍。但是,在17个国家/地区的报道差异很大。一些地区报告称其拥有超过70%的ITN所有权和正常的IRS活动,而其他地区则没有覆盖偏远的农村地区,这些地区的LF风险可能很高并且与L.loa高风险并存。 \ ud \ ud结论\ ud \ ud尽管许多非洲国家启动LF的MDA行动缓慢,但对NTD的持续承诺和全球财政支持以及同时开展的疟疾病媒控制活动是有希望的。 GPELF的能力并没有超出其到2020年消除全球LF的目标,但是监测和评估这些活动在未来十年的影响对于其成功至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号